Table of Contents
PPT Slide
PPT Slide
NASA/SEAS Center Profile (1997-1998)
SEAS Center Process Improvement
PPT Slide
Approach
SEI Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
Complementary Use of Benchmarks
SEAS Center Benchmarking History
Summary of Benchmarking Activities
Similarities Found in CMMand ISO Registration
PPT Slide
PPT Slide
Experiences from the 4-Year Effort
Cost* Distribution for Process
Return on Investment (ROI) from Process Improvement Efforts
Productivity-Quality Trends Over Time
ROI: Impact of CMM Maturity onCost, Quality, Manageability
Relative Impact of Improvement Activities(Most Significant)
Relative Impact of Improvement Activities(Least Significant)
7 Steps to Success
Operate As a Level 5 Organization
Measure from “Day 1”; Build Models to “Understand”
Set Specific Incremental “Gates”
Adopt Concept ofSeparation of Concerns
Deploy Processes to Projects
Measure Improvement by“Product” not by “Process”
Allocate Appropriate Resources
Produce 3 Specific Products Early
Conclusion
Current Status
Organization Maturity Profile
Time to Move Up
The Five Levels of Software Process Maturity
Key Process Areas of CMM
CMM Precepts
PPT Slide
PPT Slide
ROI* for Process Activities(Investment is cost of establishing - not operating)(Return is benefit to projects and organization )
|
Author: Flight Dynamics Division
Email: fmcgarry@csc.com
Home Page: www.csc.com
|